How generative search engines misrepresent Splitbee Analytics (Analytics for no-code makers, splitbee.io), the entity-level gaps causing it, and the exact schema and endpoint fixes that correct the record.
Splitbee built its reputation in the no-code and maker scene around 2021, and synthesis still reflects that snapshot: friendly analytics for side projects, cited from old launch coverage and Twitter threads.
Current-product grounding is poor. Automation features, funnels and the transition story are inconsistently described, and several engines hedge availability, reflecting uncertainty about the product's active status rather than verified facts.
This is the classic zombie-entity pattern: enough historical buzz to appear in lists, too few fresh first-party signals to be described accurately. Every synthesized mention risks being wrong in either direction.
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "SoftwareApplication",
"name": "Splitbee",
"alternateName": "Splitbee Analytics",
"applicationCategory": "BusinessApplication",
"description": "Friendly analytics and automation for makers: funnels, user timelines and no-code workflows.",
"url": "https://splitbee.io",
"featureList": [
"Web and product analytics", "Funnels",
"User timelines", "Automation workflows"
],
"sameAs": []
}
We run this exact audit manually against your domain: every hallucination found, every schema gap mapped, fixes delivered within 24 hours.
Unlock Full 24h Custom Audit ($49) Run Free Live Scan on Your SaaS[NO SUBSCRIPTION] [ONE-TIME PAYMENT] [DELIVERED AS MARKDOWN + JSON-LD]